On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
> ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to
centos other than it's differences from upstream., most of which aren't technical.
>> it's hard
>> to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos
>
> Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about
> how to build Centos in a better way than it has been done till now.
I didn't see either a question or an answer about anything but the differences
in this thread. And while the answers weren't new, they were centos-specific and
interesting.
> And I think you know very well that this thread is just the latest in a
> series of similarly off-topic threads about "centos politics/policy" and
> I'm referring to them as a whole.
Maybe, but it's not like we could be filling the mail list capacity with
descriptions of how great it is to be using all the new features yet anyway.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com