[CentOS] about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox working

Mon Apr 4 12:41:08 UTC 2011
Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf
>Of ken
>Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have
>Shockwave/.Firefox working
>Under "Tools..." I have "Adobe Reader 9.3", "Adobe Reader 9.4"
>(temporarily disabled due to testing), "Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2
>Plug-in Compatible", "NPAPI Plugins Wrapper 1.3.0", and "Shockwave Flash
>10 0 r153", that's all.
>Now looking at about:plugins under "Shockwave Flash" it says:
>    File: nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so
>    Version:
>    Shockwave Flash 10.2 r153
>So to your question, the evidence seems to be saying that, yes,
>Shockwave is the same as Flash, at least on Linux.  Or do you see
>something different?

Well, kinda' different over here, at least on Firefox4 running on WinXP.

Shockwave Flash
File: NPSWF32.dll
Shockwave Flash 10.2 r152

Shockwave for Director
File: np32dsw.dll
Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version

Some differences are expected I guess, platform-wise. Just wasn't sure if 
Shockwave and Flash were the same thing. Will be quiet now. 8-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2135 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110404/3efa4b08/attachment-0003.bin>