[CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

Wed Apr 6 23:09:13 UTC 2011
Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ian Murray wrote:

>> On 04/06/2011 09:30 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>> As previously stated,  "in-reply-to" isn't a mandatory field as far as I can
>>> tell, so it is a  stretch to call it "broken". However, now that someone
>>> actually stopped  the time-wasting and told me the issue precisely, I 
>>> was able to rectify it rather than have me second-guess it.

Superiority is about keeping people ignorant and point out the ignorance 
(preferably in public).

>> in-reply-to isn't the only way to  retain thread sanity
> Do you honestly not have anything better to do? For your info before I posted,
> Markmail seemed to sort it out okay as did the OP who posted.

We are all waiting for the first sucker to tell you to stop this thread 
because if you keep Karanbir busy it will make the CentOS 6.0 release late !

-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/

[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]