[CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

Thu Apr 7 20:27:53 UTC 2011
Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com>

on 4/7/2011 1:02 PM Dag Wieers spake the following:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Tom H wrote:
>>> This is the kind of answer that CentOS as a project
>>> shouldn't allow (KB's recent use-something-else email is
>>> another example) because it makes the developers look like
>>> rank amateurs.
>> It is _so_ easy to tell others what they should or should not
>> do.  Easier still for a bystander to criticize to jeer and
>> mock from the sidelines
> When people state the project can do better, who did translate "the 
> project" to "Johnny" or "Karanbir" ? Nobody did, except Johnny and 
> Karanbir.
> Nobody is asking Johnny or Karanbir to work harder, that's the fallacy.
> But only Johnny and Karanbir can change how this project is organized at 
> the moment and the project is currently organized in such a way that if we 
> want more timely releases and updates, or we want better communication, or 
> we want more transparancy, Johnny and Karanbir will have to work harder.
> It doesn't have to be like this, but it feels like certain forces want to 
> keep things framed like this in discussions.
Are they resistant to change, or maybe just really don't know where to start?
It looks like the latter may apply a little better.