On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark<sclark at netwolves.com> wrote: >> On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be >> applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an >> adjustment. >> Akemi >> >> I just finished building a kernel based on >> kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.src.rpm. I hand applied the patches. Like you said >> one applied clean the other applied with a fuzz offset of -36 (IIRC). I am >> installing now to test. >> >> My rebuild was simply cp the /boot/config-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.i686 to >> .config;make oldconfig;make rpm >> >> That is why I was asking about the proper way. >> >> I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. > Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they > will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. > > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report that they appear to work as advertised. With: net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2 Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were accepted and I could still forward packets. I didn't make new patches, I simply did %define with_fuzzy_patches 1 Also what should the normal rpmbuild line be? I ended up doing rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec --with firmware --without debug --without debuginfo The first time I didn't have --with firmware and the kernel wouldn't install. Regards, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110408/810847ac/attachment-0003.html>