[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Tue Apr 19 11:56:22 UTC 2011
Markus Falb <markus.falb at fasel.at>

On 18.4.2011 17:40, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/18/2011 10:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Where is it (besides their bugzilla) that upstream warns customers of
>> this known issue?  I am all for fixing things and posting things and
>> such, but CentOS (with no SLA) is now being held to a higher standard
>> than upstream (with paid customers)?
> Good question, and I'd be very surprised if there is no answer.  Killing 
> evolution and Gnome panel should be a very visible issue and CentOS has 
> the dubious luxury of some time elapsing before updates are duplicated 
> to become aware of any bad effects.

It is a divided community. One reads forum the other one reads mail,
which is unfortunate. In a perfect world there would be a forum to
mailing list and reverse gateway, maybe.

Kind Regards, Markus Falb

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110419/8cbccce1/attachment-0003.sig>