On 18.4.2011 17:40, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/18/2011 10:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> Where is it (besides their bugzilla) that upstream warns customers of >> this known issue? I am all for fixing things and posting things and >> such, but CentOS (with no SLA) is now being held to a higher standard >> than upstream (with paid customers)? > > Good question, and I'd be very surprised if there is no answer. Killing > evolution and Gnome panel should be a very visible issue and CentOS has > the dubious luxury of some time elapsing before updates are duplicated > to become aware of any bad effects. > It is a divided community. One reads forum the other one reads mail, which is unfortunate. In a perfect world there would be a forum to mailing list and reverse gateway, maybe. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110419/8cbccce1/attachment-0003.sig>