[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Tue Apr 19 12:12:29 UTC 2011
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 04/18/2011 10:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/18/2011 10:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Where is it (besides their bugzilla) that upstream warns customers of
>> this known issue?  I am all for fixing things and posting things and
>> such, but CentOS (with no SLA) is now being held to a higher standard
>> than upstream (with paid customers)?
> Good question, and I'd be very surprised if there is no answer.  Killing 
> evolution and Gnome panel should be a very visible issue and CentOS has 
> the dubious luxury of some time elapsing before updates are duplicated 
> to become aware of any bad effects.

This is true ... and Les, I'll appoint you as the guy who reads all the
redhat bug reports and updates this list when there is an issue.

This is EXACTLY the kind of thing that any CentOS user can do to help
the project.

This is the kind of help we need.

Not giving access to the build system for everyone in the world, but
things like this.  People to scour the RedHat bugzilla and create/update
pointers in the CentOS one.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110419/d1adccdd/attachment-0003.sig>