On 08/25/2011 09:18 AM, ken wrote: > On 08/25/2011 08:47 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I don't think that is necessary; >> this newsgroup does not seem to me to be over-loaded >> with OT material, or indeed with material of any kind. >> Splitting it would just be a nuisance, in my case at least. >> >> Surely it is easy enough to avoid reading an article >> labelled OT? >> > I agree. There isn't that much OT stuff here in the first place. And > it's really not that hard to hit the delete key if you don't want to see it. > > If there's going to be an OT list, why not also have a list for Stuff > That Doesn't Answer the OP's Question and another for Discussions Gone > Off on an Irrelevant Tangent... and another list: Threads I'm Not > Interested In. > > :) > I agree. I use Thunderbird and all I do is press 't' and it marks the thread read and goes the next thread. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110825/2d703f19/attachment-0004.html>