[CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
Michael Lampe
lampe at gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de
Wed Dec 28 16:25:25 UTC 2011
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Biarch is actually only needed for libraries and support packages.
> Running native i386 application on x86_64 does not make much sense
> (third-party apps are another thing).
I also like the option to compile, run, test, debug, etc. my own
programs as 32 bit. That's why starting with 5.x there's not only the
libs, but also the devel-packages.
Biarch is at least to me a valuable feature. Anyway it's all there, just
not in the ISOs it seems.
-Michael
More information about the CentOS
mailing list