[CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

Fri Feb 18 15:35:15 UTC 2011
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 02/18/2011 09:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes<johnny at centos.org>  wrote:
>>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree
>>>>> either.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So CentOS6 cannot be released, or even built completely before
>>>> those missing src.rpms are released?
>>>
>>> Theoretically, it can not be built, so certainly not *released*, until
>>> we have all the SRPMS, no.
>>>
>>> If said SRPMS are on one of the release Source ISOs, then we have them
>>> available there, if they are not then we are stuck.
>>
>> Johnny,
>>
>> Does<http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/source/SRPMS/vendor/>
>> contain anything y'all need that you don't already have?
>>
> 
> No disrespect Larry, but pulling missing SRPM packages from Scientific 
> Linux is not the answer. The answer lies in comparing those packages 
> available on Red Hat's public ftp servers with those in the distro and 
> filing bugs against the missing SRPM packages. Red hat are usually quick 
> to respond to such issues.

We have mad Red Hat aware of the missing SRPMS.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110218/e6666541/attachment-0005.sig>