On 02/18/2011 04:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/18/2011 09:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes<johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree >>>>>> either. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So CentOS6 cannot be released, or even built completely before >>>>> those missing src.rpms are released? >>>> >>>> Theoretically, it can not be built, so certainly not *released*, until >>>> we have all the SRPMS, no. >>>> >>>> If said SRPMS are on one of the release Source ISOs, then we have them >>>> available there, if they are not then we are stuck. >>> >>> Johnny, >>> >>> Does<http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/source/SRPMS/vendor/> >>> contain anything y'all need that you don't already have? >>> >> >> No disrespect Larry, but pulling missing SRPM packages from Scientific >> Linux is not the answer. The answer lies in comparing those packages >> available on Red Hat's public ftp servers with those in the distro and >> filing bugs against the missing SRPM packages. Red hat are usually quick >> to respond to such issues. > > We have mad Red Hat aware of the missing SRPMS. we? funny... -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"