[CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

Fri Feb 18 16:03:22 UTC 2011
John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com>

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and
> omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did
> according to reports.

	At some point do you think perhaps you can learn how to trim
	replies to only that which is germane to the reply and not
	include all the cascade text and attributions which proceeded it
	as a courtesy to others on this list?

	It seems that nearly every release there are SRPMs that fail to
	make it to Redhat's public ftp server.  It happens during
	releases and it happens for normal updates and is nothing new.
	It's simple human error, not a conspiracy to harm CentOS or any
	other rebuilding effort.  Can you please keep the conspiracy
	nonsense to yourself?


Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110218/07125d6e/attachment-0005.sig>