On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > >> I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and >> omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did >> according to reports. >> > At some point do you think perhaps you can learn how to trim > replies to only that which is germane to the reply and not > include all the cascade text and attributions which proceeded it > as a courtesy to others on this list? > > It seems that nearly every release there are SRPMs that fail to > make it to Redhat's public ftp server. It happens during > releases and it happens for normal updates and is nothing new. > It's simple human error, not a conspiracy to harm CentOS or any > other rebuilding effort. Can you please keep the conspiracy > nonsense to yourself? > > > > > John I thought the big thing made about bottom posting is so you can see the whole thread. If you cut out a bunch then you might as well top post. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110218/dccc10f7/attachment-0005.html>