On 02/16/2011 09:20 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >> As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long >> and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the >> way, they also have not released 5.6 or 6.0 either. This is not easy. >> It takes time. > > Johnny, > > A minor correction; Oracle released late last month and SL released > even earlier per the first trouble report at > <http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=8&sessionId=1&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=106641>, > namely: > > • 5.6 release history: > – RedHat released RHEL 5.6 on 13-Jan > – CERN released SLC 5.6 on 20-Jan > – FNAL released SL 5.6 last week > > We've been running SL 5.6 for quite some time (ONLY ON CERTAIN BOXEN > while waiting on CentOS). To the best of my knowledge, you are running BETA's or ALPHA's and not "released" 5.6 products for SL 5.6 ... http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions Or maybe I am missing something? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110216/021b64a1/attachment-0004.sig>