John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> I was puzzled to not that the former of the two is an rpm of zero bytes. > > Why puzzled? I'm guessing it's just an empty RPM with a load of > dependencies as a way of cleaning up the dependency chain. Ok, I didn't rpm -ql to see what was in it, but as it listed as empty... and why wouldn't the driver rpm have the dependencies in it? mark