On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I was puzzled to not that the former of the two is an rpm of zero bytes. Why puzzled? I'm guessing it's just an empty RPM with a load of dependencies as a way of cleaning up the dependency chain. jh
Thu Jul 21 14:07:10 UTC 2011
John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I was puzzled to not that the former of the two is an rpm of zero bytes. Why puzzled? I'm guessing it's just an empty RPM with a load of dependencies as a way of cleaning up the dependency chain. jh