On 11/06/2011 05:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 06.11.2011 14:27, schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> On 11/06/2011 05:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 >>> >>> i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now >>> or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336 >> >> People should really stop relying on php-eaccelerator and move on. Right >> now going to the projects website just show a default installation apache >> page and there seems to be no development taking place other than clunky >> patches to make it survive the latest php changes. >> Given that APC is basically the official bytecode cache now and will >> probably be soon merged into the php core I'm not sure why people are still >> bothering with dead projects. > > eaccelerator works fine with PHP 5.3 > > it works fine with Fedora since F9 until F15 here in production > php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-20.fc15.20111029.rh.x86_64 > > before PHP 5.3 i thought also it is dead because upstream > did not show progress until suddenly a perfectly working > version was ready for download > > so as long as i use eaccelerator on> 20 production servers since > years and the only CentOS test-system is broken i see no reason > to play with apc around because i do not like to switch for > one single customer to a extension we are not using in prodcution > nor is tehre any reason to suddenly switch to APC That's the point. Right now you don't have to "suddenly" switch but can install APC on a machine or two and get familiar with it. I just prefer to choose my deployed tech proactively and don't like to wait for a project to be terminated forcing a switch on me. Regards, Dennis