On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:16 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>>> Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing >>>> production deployments.  >>>>  http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status >>> That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 >>> Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in >>> production at several sites. It works. >>> <http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO> >>> Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on >>> the users list. >> /me salutes the white mice that will make samba4 better and completely >> ready to take over the Windows AD service. > > You can already have a mix of Samba 4 and Windows 2008R2 domain > controllers in the same domain. I know...but I wanna not have to have any Windows AD. > > If you create an S3 domain you face the grisly prospects of having to > upgrade that domain to an S4/AD domain someday. Which is *not* fun. > Thanks. I'll stick with the current Windows 2000 AD until samba4 is ready!