[CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Fri Oct 28 17:31:05 UTC 2011
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Lists
<centos-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> How is, say, being
>> required to pay a license fee as a consequence different from losing
>> something you have already contracted and paid for?
> It would surprise me if Red Hat would not refund the customer or let
> them ride out the term of what they have already paid for. And didn't
> the customer agree to Red Hat's terms (AUP) when they signed the contract?

The question is, how can a contract containing restrictions on what
you can do with GPL covered content not invalidate your own right to
redistribute, given that the GPL prohibits additional restrictions?

   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com