m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Digimer wrote: >> On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote: >>> >>> Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect >>> >>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html >>> >> Beyond the whole "Streisand effect"[1], you've provided no evidence that >> these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to >> have jurisdiction to request the removal, either. > <snip> > Furthermore, that's four years old. I haven't bothered to go there, but > what assurance would anyone have that it was *not* correct four years ago? > > Or is this intended as a prequel to a takedown notice, in which case > #insert FLAME_ON.h And, following up my own post, which "formation" were you referring to, a military formation? A rock formation? We don't have enough INformation.... mark "so, did he pass 6th grade English?"