[CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usTue Sep 27 19:01:33 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
- Next message: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Digimer wrote: > On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote: >> >> Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect >> >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html >> > Beyond the whole "Streisand effect"[1], you've provided no evidence that > these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to > have jurisdiction to request the removal, either. <snip> Furthermore, that's four years old. I haven't bothered to go there, but what assurance would anyone have that it was *not* correct four years ago? Or is this intended as a prequel to a takedown notice, in which case #insert FLAME_ON.h mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
- Next message: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list