On 08/16/2012 01:30 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 08/15/2012 10:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I don't this would impact it, but if the underlying file system of the >> samba machine's file system is ext4 and if it is a 64-bit machine, it might. >> >> http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-bit-by-ext4-structure-change/ > I guess this must be: > > # rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.32-279.el6|fgrep hash|fgrep ext4 > - [fs] ext4: return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage type (J. > Bruce Fields) [813070] > > Is the 813070 number a bugzilla entry? I get an access denied when > trying to read it. > > Is there an easy way to remove this patch to test it (in a test > environment, the main server is back on the old kernel)? > > In the Good Old Days redhat kernel SRPMS were a vanilla kernel plus > 1.0e+117 patches, now it doesn't look so simple. > No easy way at all to do it. The only way to do it is with RHN access and then you can look at individual commits to the version control system and try to back one out. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120816/d8c1d4af/attachment-0005.sig>