[CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

Sat Aug 4 19:39:53 UTC 2012
Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>

On 04.08.2012 20:32, Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>> On 08/04/2012 05:06 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > Using BTRFS now is like using ZFS in 2005.
>> > ZFS is adult now, BTRFS is not
> ZFS is the best I know for filesystems >= 2 TB and in case you need 
> flexible
> snapshots. ZFS has just one single problem, it is slow in case you 
> ask it to
> verify a stable FS state, UFS is much faster here, but this ZFS 
> "problem" is
> true for all filesystems on Linux because of the implementation of 
> the Linux
> buffer cache.
> And BTW: ZFS is based on the COW ideas I made in 1988 and the NetApp 
> patents
> are also just based on my master thesis without giving me credit ;-)


Given your expertise then, can you say how mature/stable/usable is ZFS 
on Linux, specifically CentOS?
That's what everybody is probably most interested in.

Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!