[CentOS] USB install annoyances
office at plnet.rs
Mon Jan 9 21:30:24 UTC 2012
On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs.... This was bounced, which makes twice today.
>>> <snip> more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
>> your email is being relayed through 126.96.36.199
>> (oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) which appears on several spam lists, for
>> instance, sorbs says 100s of spams have been sent from that host in the
>> past interval.
>> you want to use a spammer-friendly service as your mail server, expect
>> to be treated as a spammer and blocked by admins tired of the deluge..
> Let's go through this again - we did it months ago. My site is hosted by
> hostmonster, which also operates as bluehost. They are a *large* provider,
> with hundreds of thousands of domains, and the email from all of them go
> through their (few) email servers. Therefore, when 100 or so of them
> running WinBlows get their hosts infected, and they send out spam, and the
> hosting provider hasn't caught them yet, hundreds of thousands of the rest
> of us get hit with the same block.
> Who here is *not* using a work email? Who here posts from their own
> hosting site? Has this ever happened to you?
I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP customers can only send mail
via my server, with all the prevention's I could think of. I have never
been hit with this (but I do have small customer base), but I have had
regular domains (like one local Bank!!!) blocked to deliver to my server
because they do not have proper FQDN.
(Love is in the Air)
Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
More information about the CentOS