[CentOS] USB install annoyances (not OT)
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
todd.denniston at navy.mil
Tue Jan 10 20:37:28 UTC 2012
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
> Behalf Of m.roth at 5-cent.us
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:48
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] USB install annoyances (not OT)
> John Doe wrote:
> > From: "m.roth at 5-cent.us" <m.roth at 5-cent.us>
> >> I've retried again, and it still fails. I see that it's mounted
> >> /dev/sda2, which is where I've got the contents of a DVD, as
> > Unless you specifically need the DVD contents, maybe try with
> > the ISOs instead...
> This doesn't vaguely answer my question.
I think it does, but not to the detail level you need. Details below.
> The install.img mounted the
> partition, by itself, as /mnt/isolinux. That's what *IT* did. I
> had the partition as a clone of the dvd by mount -o loop and rsync.
> But I've just rebuilt the USB key partition from the latest 2 DVDs we
> locally (I rsync'd Pagckages/. from the second one into the Packages
> directory I made when I rsync'd the first DVD, so it should look like
> one-disk DVD. As soon as that finishes, I'll try another time....
> Unless someone has the explicit answer to what is the image, or
> the install.img wants to mount to get the repo, please don't reply.
From what I recall: you can
* boot the USB
* layout and format the disks (we assume using anaconda)
And when you get towards package selection, anaconda fails indicating
' that it can't find "image# 1".'
The "image# 1" it is looking for is the .iso which could have been burnt
to a DVD for doing the install, i.e., not something from the images
directory from THAT iso.
As RHEL6 anaconda derives from something post the rawhide that I
submitted the following bug on, it may help you understand.
summary: anaconda will not trust any mounted file system for the rpm's
to install, it only trusts media images and http.
I hope this helps you, of course I could always be wrong.
More information about the CentOS