[CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
Giles Coochey
giles at coochey.netTue Jan 10 16:17:44 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, January 10, 2012 17:15, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> >> One *could* argue that Java is a bug, being a) so error-prone, b) so >> vulnerable to attack, and c) so huge and slow, and shouldn't be >> allowed.... > > But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you > should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and > OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor. > So if I were to develop a CPU type and/or OS that didn't support Java then you would lock yourself out of the very language you appear to advocate?
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list