[CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Jan 10 16:40:06 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey <giles at coochey.net> wrote: >> >> But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you >> should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and >> OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor. >> > > So if I were to develop a CPU type and/or OS that didn't support Java then > you would lock yourself out of the very language you appear to advocate? > Being locked out of some oddball thing is not at all the same situation as being locked into what only a single vendor provides. But try something like 'jenkins' (http://jenkins-ci.org/) with an assortment of cross-platform nodes to get the idea of how handy a language with remoting across many platforms can be. It's painless to install try, even if you only use it on a single box. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list