On 07/11/2012 07:28 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Natxo Asenjo <natxo.asenjo at gmail.com> wrote: >> Most informed people know how much Oracle has >> contributed to OSS, but also how it has tried 'monetize' other stuff > Gee, someone could think that they are a for-profit corporation, like > IBM (whose DB2 is NOT open source, or Lotus Notes, also NOT open > source), yet I don´t see the level of IBM hatred that I routinely see > wrt ORCL. > > When any corporation puts money into the development of FOSS > technologies (like IBM, Oracle, and RedHat has done, I applaud them). > Yet, some people always find a need to bash those, as having an evil > agenda, namely *god forbid* the PROFIT word... I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their dealings with foss as opposed to IBM. > But like you say business as usual or "move along, nothing to see here". ;) > > FC > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com