How much GB RAM RHEL 7 64bit support ? Công Nghệ VPS - LEVU BIS Co., Ltd Website : <a href="http://congnghevps.net">http://congnghevps.net</a> Email : info at congnghevps.net Phone : 055.3.842.159 Yahoo : levubis XEN VPS, Cloud VPS, Dedicated Server, Game Server > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:21:27 +1300 > From: peter at pajamian.dhs.org > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public > > On 12/15/2013 09:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 12/14/2013 8:55 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Nobody wants old desktop apps. > > > > new apps tend to have heavier memory and performance requirements. > > > > we don't run 16 bit stuff anymore either, and 16 bit computers, like > > intel 286, are LONG obsolete, outside of the low end embedded market. > > That's a bit different, Linux never had 16 bit support, but is still > perfectly usable on a 32 bit arch. I understand RedHat dropping 32 bit > support for this release, the needs of RedHat customers are different to > those of CentOS users, when you fork out a few grand for a server > license it's not such a big deal to get a new server to go with it. > > That said, it may not be very difficult to build the sources for i386, > and I personally don't see any reason why CentOS can't or shouldn't. > The 32 bit arch will be in a separate repo to the 64 bit, so won't > interfere with upstream compatibility, and CentOS likely already has the > infra in place to do a 32 bit build from prior versions. Since Fedora > still fully supports 32 bit, right up to rawhide it's reasonable to > assume that the RedHat sources should build to 32 bit without too much fuss. > > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos