> If you do not change any of the CentOS RPMS with your added content then > it would be fine to use the official CentOS branding and installer. > Your content as well as ours (the entire compilation) would need to be > GPL compatible with sources available, etc. We don't change any CentOS RPMS, and all added RPMS are distributed under GPL license. > I assume you are changing at least /etc/redhat-release and other things > if you are shipping a "distribution" though, so the above is likely not > true. If you replace CentOS content with your own, then we would > request that you change the branding for the installer. We don't neither replace the /etc/redhat-release from the RPM: after the first boot there is a simple bash script which changes the redhat-release link. In the end, I think we can use CentOS name and logos without re-branding. Thanks for the support. -- Giacomo Sanchietti