-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Timothy Murphy said the following on 02/11/2013 13:57: > Having looked into postfix/amavis a little further, it seems to me to > involve excessively complicated processes (at least for a simple home > server) with email going along spaghetti-like routes. For a simple home mail server that routes all the outbound mail to ISP MTA every software is fine, also a SMTP emulator written in Perl :) If you are the sysadmin of MTAs on the front line and you have a lot of users things change. When you choose a MTA you must take in account many factors and try to avoid "religion" arguments. Among such factors: * security * easy (for the SysAdmin in charge, not for EVERY SysAdmin) to manage and configure * active support * security * interoperability with the other components of the mail system (user base, IMAP/POP server, antivirus, antispam, vacation...) * speed * security * log files easy to read to trace mail errors * easy implementation of "new" mail protocol extension (such as TLS) There are often some sort of "mail ecosystems", that is a group of programs (MTA, IMAP, administration tools, Webmail) that interact nicely one with another. That said, choosing a MTA is not like casting a vote in a ballot, but making a wise logical decison after an extensive analysis of the situation. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ To err is human; to really screw things up requires the root password. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJ1OHMACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZTrcgCeNdQX8f49XXaVk7QOqZ7J85yq BXQAoLN866q7Iq33jmCdGzMglCAT7w6R =TJYO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----