On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Wes James wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > <snip> > >> > >> mark "NOT a fan of selinux, dealt with it far too much" > >> > > OK. Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then? I guess > > in permissive mode, you could still monitor the logs and take action, if > > needed. > > 1. The most widely used distro of Linux in the US is RHEL ("upstream") and > RHEL-derived distros, > like CentOS. RHEL gives you selinux. > 2. You really expect any organization, much less a large one, to change > distros just because > there's issues that annoy sysadmins, and only occasionally users > (due to sysadmins > fighting the good fight, and mostly beating the damn thing)? > 3. I really, *REALLY* like a *stable* distro (don't get me started on > fedora). None of us > wants to debug the o/s.... > > Yeah, I'm the one who does most of the shut selinux up around here.... > > mark > Ok. Thanks for the info. -wes