On 2013-11-05, Wes James <comptekki at gmail.com> wrote: > > Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then? If it were harder to disable (either temporarily or permanently) then I could see someone making this case. But it's trivial to disable SELinux in CentOS, so there's no real reason to use a different distro just because it doesn't use SELinux. --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us