[CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

Lamar Owen lowen at pari.edu
Wed Apr 30 18:21:35 UTC 2014


On 04/30/2014 01:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:
>> Dynamic DNS can be, yes.  It depends upon the way the zone file is
>> updated and whether it's Internet-exposed on not.
> So how can it be dynamic, but controlled at the same time?
>
Set up a DD-WRT consumer router for use with OpenDNS by way of 
dns-o-matic and you'll see how.  Now replace OpenDNS and dns-o-matic 
with your own services.

> I'll take [SRV record examples] as a 'no' for the general case. 
How is an RFC quote and an example of a running standardized application 
using the feature a 'no?'  Please read 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record and see just how standardized 
it is.

>  How is [rolling a cloud instance dev VM] easier than saying 'ssh 
> nodename yum -y install postgresql-server'/ Something I already know 
> how to do and how to make happen any number of ties - and something 
> that works on real hardware and in spite of the differences in VM 
> cloud tools.

How do you guarantee a clean sandbox?  In the cloud case, every VM 
rolled is as clean as the template that generated it, and gives you a 
known starting point.  And I use PostgreSQL as the example since I 
maintained those RPMs for five years, and I understand the need for a 
clean sandbox, having learned the hard way what can happen if you don't 
take the care to make your sandbox clean (this was pre-mach, and 
definitely pre-mock, and buildroots had to be carefully regulated since 
they weren't cleanly sandboxed by mock and kin).

> At the expense of being black magic that won't work outside of that
> environment.  I don't like magic.  I don't like things that lock you
> in to only one vendor/tool/OS.
OpenStack will do most of what I'm talking about already.

> Actually, I'd like to see a single device do all of that gunk plus
> have an HDMI out to act as a media player so a typical home would only
> need one extra 'thing' besides the computer/tablet/phone.  But it
> doesn't matter - you still have to configure it somehow.  Do you want
> things to guess at your firewall rules?
>
That last point is exactly what UPNP was supposed to solve.

Such a device as you want exists; see the GuruPlug Display and 
descendants.  They are definitely tinkering boxen, and they do have 
their issues (I have a GuruPlug Server Plus with the eSATA port and the 
infamous overheating problems) but they are available.




More information about the CentOS mailing list