On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 19:32 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Always Learning wrote: > > No one really wants to revert to Sendmail - do they ? > It worked fine for me for years - what do you have against it? Sendmail lacks the configurability of Exim. I can refuse connections if the sender's host name resembles a home Internet connection (contains dyn* static nnn-nnn-nnn-nnn or nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn or is on the list of home-type hosts such as *dsl.bell.ca etc. etc.) I refuse connections when the HELO / EHLO does not resolve to the sender's IP address, for example Sender's IP : 62.25.80.157 = mail1.bemta105.messagelabs.com Host name : mail1.bemta105.messagelabs.com = 62.25.80.157 HELO name : server-12.bemta-105.messagelabs.com = no IP address Date : Tuesday, 11:04, 12 August 2014, (+01:00) Sender's IP : 202.94.83.220 = 202-94-83-220.infra.usd.ac.id Host name : 202-94-83-220.infra.usd.ac.id = 202.94.83.220 HELO name : ASRI-PC = no IP address Date : Wednesday, 06:16, 13 August 2014, (+01:00) I can restrict sending to some email addresses to white-listed senders. I can get rid of pests by rejecting with a bounce message 'the recipient's mail box is full'. I can run a basic mailing list, within Exim, without having to use Mailman. Just a few bits of basic care can dramatically restrict, if not virtually stop, spam and the inevitable viruses sent in spam. I like Exim because it works well for me and it is reliable. > When I started using it, before sendmail.mc was introduced, > I found it even more difficult to configure than postfix today. What is really needed is a Plain Man's Guide to basic mail server operation. Describe the principles and how they are implemented on one's chosen mail server. Easy task to do, but I lack the time. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.