It's a trademark issue. CentOS is not Red Hat, so they can't use Red Hat's trademarks. Nothing more, nothing less. On 14/12/14 09:50 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that > there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. > Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it > undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big > argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always > always battles for turf. > > Clayton > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Digimer >> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:34 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How serious are we about not wanting to see... >> >> I don't see the concern. CentOS is a binary-compatible clone of Red Hat >> Enterprise Linux. Further, Red Hat sponsors and supports the CentOS >> project, providing confidence in it's long-term survival which business >> looking for a flavour linux want to see. >> >> CentOS users should be happy about Red Hat, not scared of it. Likewise, >> CentOS is valuable to Red Hat as it's the source of their future >> customers. So it's a very mutually beneficial relationship. >> >> digimer >> >> On 14/12/14 09:29 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: >>> Redhat in centos? I type help and the first line says redhat. Are we >>> paranoid about red..t? >>> >>> >>> >>> Clayton -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?