On 01/17/2014 10:15 AM, IonPacepa wrote: > "Essentially Red Hat is slowly taking over and developing/assisting > Centos to be a more regular and structure organisation. The fact that > Red Hat now owns the Centos brand worries me but that's life. Absolutely > nothing remains static." > > Interesting how a _community_ "Brand" can be bought. > > Seems that we get magical binaries for free but no insight into the build > process or timelines to said creation. > > Surely this was done to keep OEL at bay, but we are still caught in the > crossfire and the holders of the build secrets are getting $paid$ to keep > the secret. > > This is opensource without useful makefiles. Something Sony and Cisco do. What the heck are you talking about ... rpmbuild -ba <name>.src.rpm It builds if you install the proper packages from the CentOS repos. Using mock and a CentOS Tree can reproduce CentOS just as easily. We are creating git.centos.org so that everyone can look at and build any of the packages. We are creating a variants program so that projects can take CentOS as a base and create (on our servers) respins of the ISOs and/or repositories that get branded as CentOS. They can collaborate, ON OUR SYSTEMS, to build things for the community to use. I have no earthly idea what you are talking about ... although, you are certainly free to use (or not use) CentOS however you choose. I just wish you would research your fact before you post garbage on the list. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140117/d7d8d6d8/attachment-0005.sig>