[CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?
Always Learning
centos at u62.u22.net
Tue Jul 15 23:54:58 UTC 2014
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 10:25 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> the big thing with any of these new service managers (I'm more familiar
> with Solaris SMF than systemd, but I believe it does the same thing), is
> that it determines whether the service properly starts and tracks
> service dependencies. sysVinit style services could only be sequenced
> (start all lower numbered services before starting this one) and it had
> to wait for each service to start before going onto the next, while SMF
> and presumably systemd will start multiple services in parallel as long
> as they aren't dependent. also, SMF at least detects when a service
> fails/stops, and attempts to take corrective action per how that service
> is configured
Thank you for the enlightening information.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
More information about the CentOS
mailing list