[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
Arun Khan
knura9 at gmail.comThu Mar 27 04:27:32 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems when using tc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Christopher Jacoby <cjacoby75 at gmail.com> wrote: > I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC > bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then > finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network > service script starts working just the way I expect. > > Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server. > IMO, Network Manager is for desktop users who may connect to the 'Net in various ways, wired LAN, WiFi, USB data dongles (from Telcom providers). With bridging and bonding scenarios, it causes more heartburn than ease of use. Server installs that I undertake personally, it is turned OFF. However, when I have had to service other admin's installation, for networking issues, I turn OFF the Network Manager. -- Arun Khan
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems when using tc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list