[CentOS] Large file system idea
Ted Miller
tedlists at sbcglobal.net
Mon May 19 01:35:21 UTC 2014
On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.
How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant
progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that
some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.
Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN
More information about the CentOS
mailing list