[CentOS] Large file system idea

Ted Miller tedlists at sbcglobal.net
Mon May 19 01:35:21 UTC 2014


On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.

How recently have you looked at Gluster?  It has seen some significant 
progress, though small files are still its weakest area.  I believe that 
some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.

Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN





More information about the CentOS mailing list