On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > > BTW: > > > http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/ > > > > > Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official > "supplementary" ones from RH? > > In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment, > etc... ? > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I don't know, and that's the point! Personally, I'd be OK with using it, but since my work is audited by the Federal Gum'mint, I don't know how they'd feel about it. :) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu