On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> BTW: >>> >> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/ >>> >>> >> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official >> "supplementary" ones from RH? >> >> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment, >> etc... ? Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not. I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because they do distribute the pepperflash component. I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141106/30a9d5fe/attachment-0004.sig>