On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet >>> addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one >>> NIC >> Yes. > Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing > is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know > better and breaks it with their default settings: > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031 > > However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell > if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response > sent to the default one? And if so, can you traceroute to the > address where the connection attempt is originating? > Natting is obviously involved on this end and if the incoming ssh session is originating thru a nat then if the response packet doesn't have as a source what the original destination was the nat on the ssh end won't be able to figure where the packet should go. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com