On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Steve Lindemann wrote: >> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote: >>>>> From: Johan Vermeulen <jvermeulen at cawdekempen.be> >>>>>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef: >>>>>>> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus.... > <snip> >>> It is *completely* unacceptable to release an update that appears to >>> ignore the configuration files, and doesn't even *show* the menu, which >>> would absolutely freak out an "ordinary user". >>> >>> And to lose the tabs! I am *not* going to update firefox at work till >>> they fix this - I have stuff I need. >>> <snip> >> >> Switch to Palemoon or Qupzilla, firefox has "improved" itself to the >> point where it's just not a choice anymore, let alone a good one. I've >> been using Palemoon and it's been a damn good choice for me... ymmv > > palemoon looks nice - *is* there a package for it somewhere, or do you > have to d/l and install from their homepage? >> >> Find something else that works for you, there are other choices. It's >> gotten to the point where firefox is as bad as chrome or ie. A shame, >> it used to be such a good choice. > > I have to worry, here at work. I am *not* going to even think about trying > to force my users to use another browser, one they've never heard of (I've > never heard of either of these). This needs to be fixed.... yup, that would be the fly in the ointment. It's certainly not in the distro's I use (base,extras,updates,rpmforge,epel). I did find qupzilla in linux mint, but not palemoon and neither in the centos distro's that I use. Can't speak to other systems. For a mass install you pretty much have to roll your own. I've only used it on individual systems that I work with directly and downloaded from the website. I can only speak to my personal use. Hopefully it will start showing up in the distro's, we definitely need something other than firefox these days. -- Steve