On 9/25/2014 9:07 AM, Steve Lindemann wrote: > On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Steve Lindemann wrote: >>> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>>> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote: >>>>>> From: Johan Vermeulen <jvermeulen at cawdekempen.be> >>>>>>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef: >>>>>>>> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus.... >> <snip> >>>> It is *completely* unacceptable to release an update that appears to >>>> ignore the configuration files, and doesn't even *show* the menu, which >>>> would absolutely freak out an "ordinary user". >>>> >>>> And to lose the tabs! I am *not* going to update firefox at work till >>>> they fix this - I have stuff I need. >>>> <snip> >>> >>> Switch to Palemoon or Qupzilla, firefox has "improved" itself to the >>> point where it's just not a choice anymore, let alone a good one. I've >>> been using Palemoon and it's been a damn good choice for me... ymmv >> >> palemoon looks nice - *is* there a package for it somewhere, or do you >> have to d/l and install from their homepage? >>> >>> Find something else that works for you, there are other choices. It's >>> gotten to the point where firefox is as bad as chrome or ie. A shame, >>> it used to be such a good choice. >> >> I have to worry, here at work. I am *not* going to even think about >> trying >> to force my users to use another browser, one they've never heard of >> (I've >> never heard of either of these). This needs to be fixed.... > > yup, that would be the fly in the ointment. It's certainly not in the > distro's I use (base,extras,updates,rpmforge,epel). I did find qupzilla > in linux mint, but not palemoon and neither in the centos distro's that > I use. Can't speak to other systems. > > For a mass install you pretty much have to roll your own. I've only > used it on individual systems that I work with directly and downloaded > from the website. I can only speak to my personal use. Hopefully it > will start showing up in the distro's, we definitely need something > other than firefox these days. > -- > Steve I meant repo's not distro's in the first paragraph ...DUH! //Steve