[CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
Jonathan Billings
billings at negate.orgWed Apr 8 20:27:23 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:16:48PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > Xorg is in fact a sub-sub-process of gdm-binary. Yup. In fact, it's possible to run GDM without X at all, such as when you're running display manager with XDMCP. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list