[CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
Leon Fauster
leonfauster at googlemail.comWed Apr 8 22:46:46 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 08.04.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: > On 2015-04-08, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> gdm is a "sub-process" of X ... >> > Not according to the output of pstree. See the following snippet: oh, i had something in mind that obviously is obsolete, okay :-) -- LF
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list