[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

Mon Apr 27 20:06:45 UTC 2015
Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>

<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:

> First, I was not aware that the US had declared any part of the GPL null

Just ask US lawyers..... one of them sits on the other side of the corridor of 
my office, another is the well known Lawrence Rosen.

For Europe check the reasoning of the cases from Harald Welte. One of them is 
very obvious when mentioning that the judge intentionally did look only at a 
single sentence from the GPL in order not to endanger the rights of Harald 
Welte.

> and void. Second, just to play Eris... which *version* of the GPL are you
> talking about in this arguement, 1.x, 2.x, or 3.x?

Add GPL-v0 for the GCC from 1986.....

You should know what GPL version we are talking if you understand what we 
discuss.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.net                    (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'