On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: > > > On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >>> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> <> >>> >>>> *sigh* >>>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>>> >>> . >>> i seriously doubt it. >>> >>> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >> >> Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, >> they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >> > . > as i wrote; > > several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. > > the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos > to respond to request that i made. Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a company that spams. For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, with hundreds of photos in different settings. So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were communicating with. But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line.