On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >>>> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> <> >>>> >>>>> *sigh* >>>>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>>>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>>>> >>>> . >>>> i seriously doubt it. >>>> >>>> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >>> >>> Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, >>> they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >>> >> . >> as i wrote; >> >> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >> >> the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos >> to respond to request that i made. > > Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a > company that spams. > . i will be polite and not ask what company. :-) > For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, > with hundreds of photos in different settings. > . yes, i have seen them. but i believe, why should i pay for what i can see for free and live. > So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were > communicating with. > . very true. > But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to > people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line. > . i agree. one should always have choice of what pleasure one receives, or gives. tho the mystery of yet to come can make pleasures greater. also, i do like to see the change in your attitude. a good indication of maturity. i still believe moz gen would be a good place to continue because of the additional input. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .